Are up at Diggers Realm and as usual, I forgot to enter a post. I always seem to remember the kittycats stuff, just not the politics. I have posted on Dhimmi stuff, just not Dhimmicrat stuff. So to not be totally amiss in writing about the Dims, one quote from Joseph Farah at WND.
Do you think the Democrats, the party of alternative lifestyles and same-sex marriages and group rights based on sexual preferences, is really morally outraged about what Foley did?
Frankly, if I hear one more Democrat call for House Speaker Dennis Hastert’s head, I think I’m going to scream. And that’s coming from me - a guy who believes Hastert should resign for mishandling this sicko under his authority.
But, please, don’t let me hear it from the gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgendered-hermaphrodite-whathaveyou Democrats. This is, after all, the party that has embraced sexual perversion in all its forms - except, of course, when practiced by Republicans.
Rep. Gerry Studds and Barney Frank got slaps on the wrist (oooh, they probably liked that!) in the form of censures for behavior at least as contemptible as Foley’s.
I am not here making excuses for Foley. Like I said, Hastert should be forced out of power for not smoking this weasel out a long time ago. That’s incompetence. That’s malfeasance. It’s just that the Democrats have no moral authority when they played such a critical role in designing the anything-goes sexual climate for which we are all encouraged to be so tolerant.
Need I say more, oh but he did. Hit. Nail. On. Head.
Not that IM’s are that big of a deal, even naughty ones. Just have to watch who one is IMing, know how old they are which is tricky unless you know the person. Oh, but he did, and that makes it a big deal. Still, witch hunt cause he’s a Republican, no other reason. Eediots!
Had he actually done something concrete and not just IM about it, then it would have been a big deal. I’m not losing any sleep over it in any case.