The Commisar has set up a new blog, Friends of Saddam to bring together in one place all the dirt on the oil for food scandal. As reported in the New York Times, hard info is going to be hard to come by.
Meanwhile, because U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan’s son was on the payroll of the Swiss company hired to monitor the imports, and because Kofi’s right-hand man had been in charge of the program rife with 10 percent kickbacks, the world’s foremost diplomat announced he would appoint an independent panel to investigate.
He chose men of integrity: Paul Volcker, former U.S. Fed chairman; Judge Richard Goldstone, the first Balkans war crimes prosecutor; and Mark Pieth, a Swiss lawyer said to be an expert on money laundering.
End of cover-up, right? Wrong. Volcker properly required a Security Council resolution, which would presumably empower his panel to take sworn testimony and gain access to the U.N.’s corrupt contracts that enabled Saddam to build palaces instead of providing food to his people.
Dumb, dumb because it would require the approval of the very countries that had their hands in the til and that will not be forthcoming.
But such a U.N. resolution would reveal dealings with companies in Russia, France and China - all Security Council permanent members whose nationals had their hands in the till. As Senator Lugar suggested, some nations had secret profiteering reasons to keep Saddam in power.
To nobody’s surprise, Vladimir Putin’s government was the first to say nothing doing. Russia’s U.N. spokesman said, “We understand the reputation of the secretariat is in question, but we do not think it is possible to adopt a resolution on the basis of mass media reports.”
Of the 270 suspected kickbackers and recipients of illegal allocations of oil whose names were revealed by Al Mada, the Iraqi newspaper, one-fourth were Russian, including a member of the Russian Parliament and a former Russian ambassador to Baghdad. No wonder Putin wanted no “regime change,” and now resists any serious investigation.
Well, it is rather obvious that those that didn’t want us to go to war with Iraq had ulterior motives, said ulterior motives being conveniently forgotton by the Left when accusing Bush of going it alone. And they will do all in their power to squelch any investigation of the truth. It will be business as usual at the U.N..
France’s U.S. ambassador writes under “Oil-for-Food Lies” in The Los Angeles Times that “unfounded accusations … have been spread by a handful of influential, conservative TV and newspaper journalists in the U.S.” He noted that all 15 members of the Security Council approved all the oil-for-food contracts, and “the complete contracts were only circulated to the U.S. and Britain, which had expressly asked to see them…” (And State shut its eyes - and has no list?)
So, the official line will be that these are unfounded accusations and the investigation will go nowhere. Question, why is our State Department in bed with the U.N.? While pondering that, might ask oneself if one really wants a President that will subvert U.S. interests and everything else to the U.N.
It will be interesting to see if concerted effort on the part of bloggers will have any effect upon the intransigence of the U.N.. Not sure anything can make much impact on that very corrupt organization which has, IMHO, outlived it’s usefulness if it ever had any.
Hat tip to The Bejus Pundit.